![]() ![]() I show how both Deleuze and Hegel see the calculus as providing a way of thinking outside of finite representation. The aim of this paper is to explore the uses made of the calculus by Gilles Deleuze and G.W.F. And it appears (as expected) that the thread out of the Labyrinth of the Continuum is not only geometrical and physical, but metaphysical too. But what is more important, such dynamical interpretation gives good schematic and systematic view of Leibnizian mature philosophy. The main point is that force can be applied both to perception and appetition of monads and by this we give the shortest Leibnizian answer to the Zeno’s Dichotomy paradox – “force”. ![]() And in such a way they are both neutralizing and preserving the syncategorematic phenomenal infinity. These perspectives (taxonomical, legislative and junctional) if put together lead to a new understanding of monads’ role and they are not taken anymore as a discreet part of Leibnizian philosophy (as opposed to the ideal space and time), but as dynamical continuum incorporating in itself both contiguity and continuity. Third, finding the precise place of dynamics and force in this (RPI) continuum. Second, analysis of the scope of the Law of Continuity famously formulated by Leibniz and mapping it onto this (RPI) structure. First, detailed differentiation of all standard realms of Leibnizian Weltanschauung – (R real), (P phenomenal), (I ideal). This dynamical interpretation of the continuum is based on a threefold perspective.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |